Legal Opinion

Bessinger v. Grotz

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 1944No. Civ. 14621PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, after trial before- the court without a jury, in an action pursuant to the provisions of section 707 of the Code of Civil Procedure * to compel an accounting for rents and profits received during the redemption period by the judgment creditor, defendant appeals.

The undisputed facts are:

On December 28, 1937, defendant purchased at a commissioner’s sale, held pursuant to a decree of foreclosure, a parcel of real estate owned by plaintiff. On January 14, 1938, defendant entered into a contract whereby he agreed to sell and convey to persons then occupying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Walker v. McCuskerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Citizens' National Bank v. Western Loan & Building Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Moore v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Gross v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wood v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API