Ratliffe v. Hartsfield Co.

Only headnotes 2 and 3 will be discussed. In a suit on a note by the Hartsfield Company against the plaintiffs in error, the following letter addressed to them was served more than ten days prior to the filing of the suit in the Fulton division of the municipal court of Atlanta: “Gentlemen: Hartsfield Company holds a note for $650, executed in April, 1932, and under its terms there is a balance of $387.06 principal, together with interest, now due. This note is signed by Dr. J. W. Katliffe, and each of you signed a guaranty on the back thereof guaranteeing the fulfillment of each of the terms…