Martin v. State

on motion for rehearing.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— On the 3rd day of February, 1937, the judgment herein was affirmed upon the proposition that the bills of exception were filed too late and could not be considered. There was no discussion of the facts in the opinion, nor of any matter of procedure complained of. Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing, insisting that we should consider his bills of exception. We are compelled to adhere to our ruling as far as said bills of exceptions are concerned.

However, we note on pages eight and nine of the transcript that appellant, H. L. Martin, presented…