Shillinglaw v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hamilton District Court. — H. E. Fry and E. M. McCall, Judges. Action in partition. Opinion states the facts. Decree dismissing- plaintiffs’ petition. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
1. Wills: rights of devises: partition by remaindermen prior to execution of trust. Thisi action is brought by certain heirs of one Andrew Shillinglaw, against certain other heirs and certain devisees named in the will of Andrew Shillinglaw, for the partition of certain real estate owned by Andrew Shillinglaw at the time of his death. The prayer of the petition is that judgment be entered confirming the shares of the parties plaintiff and defendant in the real estate, and that the land be partitioned among them. The alternative prater is that, if the land cannot be equitably divided, it be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sears v. HardyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Beaver v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Elberts v. ElbertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Smith v. RunnelsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Boland v. TiernaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Estate of DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Martin v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Holzhauser v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Traversy v. BellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- In Re Estate of MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.