Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Mark Phelps

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1990No. 88-5294Published

1Dissent

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges NORRIS, BRUNETTI, THOMPSON and O’SCANNLAIN concur,

dissenting from the order rejecting the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

By failing to take this case en banc, the court “lets stand an unfortunate and utterly needless hindrance to effective law enforcement.” United States v. Cunningham, 890 F.2d 199, 200 (9th Cir.1989) (O’Scannlain, J., dissenting from the order rejecting the suggestion for rehearing en banc). In reversing defendant’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), the panel’s opinion reads into the statute a scienter…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hallstrom v. Tillamook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Bethesda Hospital Assn. v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Richard StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. McLaughlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Juan A. Acosta-CazaresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API