Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance v. Davis

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 5, 1993No. Record 921809PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this appeal involving automobile insurance coverage, we must determine whether the trial court erred in ruling that William Patrick Holman was a permissive user of Lossie Bell Kinsey’s motor vehicle at the time it was damaged in an automobile accident.

Kinsey’s vehicle was covered under an automobile insurance policy issued by the Hartford Fire Insurance Company (Hartford). The policy defines “persons insured” as, among others, “any . . . person using such automobile with the permission of the named insured, provided his actual use thereof is within the scope of such permission.” After the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Robinson v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NYSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. TillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. PeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bratton v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2015
  2. Earth Tech, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
  3. Erie Insurance v. WillardFauquier County Circuit Court · 2008
  4. GuideOne Mutual Insurance v. MurrayVirginia Beach County Circuit Court · 2010
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ErbeAmherst County Circuit Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API