Legal Opinion
In Re Rosenkrantz
California Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 2002No. S104701PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
128 Cal.Rptr.2d 104 (2002)
29 Cal.4th 616
59 P.3d 174
In re Robert ROSENKRANTZ, on Habeas Corpus.
No. S104701.
Supreme Court of California.
December 16, 2002.
Certiorari Denied April 21, 2003.
Rowan K. Klein, Los Angeles; Prison Law Office, Donald Specter, San Quentin, Zachary Katznelson; Munger, Tolles & Olson, Alan V. Friedman and Mark H. Epstein, Los Angeles, for Petitioner Robert Rosenkrantz.
Picone & DeFilippis and Steve M. DeFilippis as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner Robert Rosenkrantz.
James F. Sweeney, Sacramento, for California Catholic Conference as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Petitioner…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Gilman v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014