Legal Opinion
Brillant v. Royal
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 31, 1991No. 89-1303, 89-1392Published
1Opinion of the Court
582 So.2d 512 (1991)
Helen B. BRILLANT and Eugene G. Brillant
v.
Dr. Lorenza ROYAL and Sterling Medical Associates.
Dr. Lorenza ROYAL and Sterling Medical Associates
v.
Helen B. BRILLANT and Eugene G. Brillant.
89-1303, 89-1392.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
May 31, 1991.
Tom Dutton of Pittman, Hooks, Marsh, Dutton & Hollis, Birmingham, for appellants/cross-appellees.
Davis Carr, of Pierce, Carr & Alford, Mobile, for appellees/cross-appellants.
ALMON, Justice.
This is a medical malpractice action brought by Helen and Eugene Brillant against Dr. Lorenza Royal and Sterling Medical Associates (hereinafter…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Bradford v. McGeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Moore-Handley Hardware Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Dean W. Lilly v. Paul R. Fieldstone, M.D., and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Williams v. BhoopathiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.