Legal Opinion

Bauman v. BALLARD FISH COMPANY

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1962No. 3089PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Chief Judge.

Appellee sued appellant, alleging that a corporation, B & W Transfer Co., of which appellant had been president, had executed a promissory note in the-sum of $4,025.57, payable to .appellee, and that appellant had individually endorsed the note; that the note was "secured by two 1955 Chevrolet trucks and one 1952 Dodge truck”; and that upon default in payment of the note the trucks had been sold and the proceeds applied to the note, leaving a balance of $1,955.57, for which judgment was asked. In his answer appellant denied personal liability on the note and alleged that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Callas v. Independent Taxi Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  2. Ford v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re D.M.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Keranen v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Fisher v. Barker FoundationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bachman v. Zoning Hearing Board of Bern TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. In Re DMCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API