Legal Opinion

Heinisch v. Christopher Bernardini

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided January 12, 2015No. Case No. CV414-221Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

G.R. SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.

Sued for committing intentional torts (civil assault, battery, etc.) against a minor female, pro se defendant Alex Christopher Bernardini moves for appointment of counsel to defend him. Doc. 42. Claiming that he is imprisoned and indigent, defendant invokes the in forma pauperis statute, specifically 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), which says that “[t]he court may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel.” Id. Plaintiffs do not oppose. Doc. 46.

28 U.S.C. § 1915 was designed to enable access to the courts by indigent litigants.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwrick Fowler v. Charlie Jones, Captain Carver, Willie E. Johnson, Warden, Asst. Warden MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. KOHLER Et Al. v. VAN PETEGHEM Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  3. Lawson v. BloodsworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Davis v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  5. Williams v. GrantDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API