White v. Midwest Office Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, Senior District Judge.
This employment discrimination action comes before the court on the individual defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 2). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Sara Pauline White alleges the following counts in her complaint: Count V— sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of the Kansas Act Against Discrimination, Kan. Stat. Ann. § 44-1009 (“KAAD”), and Title VII of the Civil rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (“Title VII”); Count VI—employment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Land v. Midwest Office Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997