Legal Opinion

Bohsancurt v. Tucson City Prosecutor's Office

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 28, 2006No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0117Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILED BY CLERK FEB 28 2006 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO DIVISION TWO KYLE BOHSANCURT, ) 2 CA-CV 2005-0117 ) DEPARTMENT A Petitioner/Appellee, ) ) OPINION v. ) ) THE HONORABLE MITCHELL ) EISENBERG, Magistrate of the Tucson ) City Court, ) ) Respondent, ) ) and ) ) TUCSON CITY PROSECUTOR’S ) OFFICE, ) ) Real Party in Interest/Appellant. ) ) APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY Cause No. C20051710 Honorable Barbara Sattler, Judge Pro Tempore REVERSED AND REMANDED Law Office of Stephen Paul Barnard, P.C. By Stephen Paul Barnard Tucson Attorney…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API