Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Brough v. Terheide

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1906No. 20,838PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Madison Circuit Court; John F. McClure, Judge. Action by tbe State of Indiana, on the relation of Edward Brougb, against John Terheide and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §133^ Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

—This is an action to recover on the bond of a retail liquor dealer. Appellee Terheide is the principal on the bond in suit and his coappellees are sureties thereon. The complaint is in two paragraphs, under each of which damages are claimed by the relator, Edward *691Brough, by reason of a personal injury sustained by him on account of the illegal sale to him of intoxicating liquors. Each of the defendants to the action separately demurred to each paragraph of the complaint for insufficiency of facts. The demurrers were sustained to each paragraph and judgment was rendered against appellant on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Homire v. HalfmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Mulcahey v. GivensIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. McCarty v. State ex rel. BooneIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Nelson v. State, ex rel. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Baecher v. State ex rel. ChandlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Michael v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. State ex rel. GaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. American Surety Co. v. State ex rel. SouersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Greener v. NiehausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Berkemeier v. State ex rel. NoeltingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API