Legal Opinion

State v. Barrows

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1885Published

Complaint for assault and battery. Heard on motion to dismiss, December Term, 1884, Veazey, J., presiding. Motion denied. It was charged in the indictment, that “the said Nellie Barrows, with force and arms, in and upon one * * * * an assault did make, and her the said * * * * did then and there heat, bruise, &c., contrary to the form, force and effect of the statute,” &c. The jurisdiction of a justice of the peace is only statutory.

Read the full summary

Complaint for assault and battery. Heard on motion to dismiss, December Term, 1884, Veazey, J., presiding. Motion denied. It was charged in the indictment, that “the said Nellie Barrows, with force and arms, in and upon one * * * * an assault did make, and her the said * * * * did then and there heat, bruise, &c., contrary to the form, force and effect of the statute,” &c. The jurisdiction of a justice of the peace is only statutory. Bennett’s Justice, 1; Paine v. Eli, 1 D. Chip. 37. The general statutory jurisdiction of justices is only in cases where the fine is not more than $10. R. L. s.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Boss, J.

The respondent was complained of before a justice of the peace for an assault and battery, and there convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $20. The respondent appealed to the County Court, and there filed a motion to dismiss the prosecution, on the claimed ground that the justice had imposed a larger fine than he was authorized by statute ta impose for such an offense. She claims that the justice’s jurisdiction in this respect is that conferred by sec. 1666, R. L., or the power to impose afine not exceeding $10. The justice of the peace held…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BenedictSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
  2. State v. RiggsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1850

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API