Legal Opinion

Theis v. Federal Finance Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 25, 1971No. 142-3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C. J.

Plaintiff, Ruth Annette Theis, seeks damages for: (1) humiliation and embarrassment; (2) loss of use of property; (3) storage charges and other incidental expenses, all of which resulted from defendant’s (Federal Finance Co., Inc.) seizure of her household goods during an attempted foreclosure by notice and sale of a forged chattel mortgage; and (4) her subsequent restraint by court order from moving goods from Spokane County or selling them during the pendency of trial. Defendant cross-complained to foreclose the mortgage.

The trial court, sitting without a jury, found in favor of plaintiff,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Browning v. Slenderella Systems of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. McGill v. W. P. Fuller & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Malo v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Desimone v. Mutual Materials Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Puget Sound Harbor No. 16 of the American Ass'n of Masters & Pilots of Steam Vessels v. Aetna Accident & Liability Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sunland Investments, Inc. v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  2. Parsons Supply, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Wilson v. City of Walla WallaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Michelson Bros. v. BadermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API