Legal Opinion

Turner v. Lyles

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 1, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Before J. H. Hudson, special Judge, Richland, March, 1903. Action by N. S. Turner against Wm. H. Lyles. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. cites: As to charge on facts: 47 S. C., 489; 56 S. C., 529. As to a promise to pay the debt of another: 29 S. C., 14; 3 Par. on Con., 24. As to trust in personal property by parol: 14 S. C., 211; 2 Hill Ch., 589. As to granting nezv trial on after-discovered evidence: 16 S. C., 116. cites: As to charge on facts: 65 S. C.,…

Read the full summary

Before J. H. Hudson, special Judge, Richland, March, 1903. Action by N. S. Turner against Wm. H. Lyles. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. cites: As to charge on facts: 47 S. C., 489; 56 S. C., 529. As to a promise to pay the debt of another: 29 S. C., 14; 3 Par. on Con., 24. As to trust in personal property by parol: 14 S. C., 211; 2 Hill Ch., 589. As to granting nezv trial on after-discovered evidence: 16 S. C., 116. cites: As to charge on facts: 65 S. C., 176, 542; 47 S. C., 373; 60 S. C., 484; 55 S. C., 414; 65 S. C., 269; 63 S. C., 197; 57 S. C., 430; 61 S. C., 574; 62 S.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The complaint sets forth two- causes of action. In the first, it is charged that the plaintiff sold to the defendant twenty bales o-f cotton, between the 1st of January, 1901, and the 20th of April, 1901, aggregating in value $1,027.92; that the defendant promised to pay plaintiff for said cotton the amount hereinbefore mentioned, which became due and payable immediately upon delivery; that at the defendant’s request the cotton was delivered to- Sutro Cotton Mills, at Yorkville, S. C.-

The first and second paragraphs of the second cause…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robertson v. HunterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dewitt Truck Brokers, Inc. v. W. Ray Flemming Fruit Company and W. Ray FlemmingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  2. State v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  3. Lorick & Lowrance v. CaldwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  4. Brickman v. Southern RailwaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  5. Stackhouse v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API