Greenberg v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; Charles B. Baris, Judge. Max Greenberg was convicted of possessing stolen goods, and be brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
MUNGER, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error, hereafter called defendant, was convicted of the offense of having unlawful possession in the city of St. Louis, Mo., of 82 pairs of shoes, which had been stolen from a railroad car in Illinois, and which had constituted a part of an interstate shipment of freight. It was charged that the defendant, at the time of his possession of the goods, knew them to have been _ stolen. Section 1, Act Eeb. 13, 1913, 37 Stat. 670 (Cpmp. Stats: § 8603). There was conflict in tibe testimony given at the trial, but it was undisputed that the shoes had been…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Feinberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Von Patzoll v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- George Dewey Stoneking v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- Shockley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.