Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 27, 1997No. 05-91-01341-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

Carl Dewayne Smith appeals his conviction of forgery. In a single point of error, appellant contends that his conviction must be reversed and this cause remanded for a new trial because the statement of facts from his October 11, 1989 deferred adjudication hearing was lost or destroyed through no fault of his own. For reasons that follow, we dismiss this appeal.

Appellant was indicted for the August 9, 1989 offense of forgery. Appellant waived his right to a jury, pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain agreement with the State, and signed a written judicial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Lyon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Dillehey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Sankey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Rodriquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  4. Cutrer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  5. Nix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API