Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Godell v. Johnson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1966Published

1Concurrence

McALLISTER, C. J.,

specially concurring.

I wish to emphasize that in Bunch v. Davidson, 242 Or 635, 409 P2d 910 (1966), defendant’s motion to with*595draw Ms motion for a directed verdict was not made until after the court had ruled on the motions for a directed verdict. Since the defendant in Bunch followed the former procedure to an ultimate ruling, his argument that the procedure should he changed .was not appealing in that case.

I concur in the majority opinion.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bunch v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966