Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Godell v. Johnson
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1966Published
1Concurrence
McALLISTER, C. J.,
specially concurring.
I wish to emphasize that in Bunch v. Davidson, 242 Or 635, 409 P2d 910 (1966), defendant’s motion to with*595draw Ms motion for a directed verdict was not made until after the court had ruled on the motions for a directed verdict. Since the defendant in Bunch followed the former procedure to an ultimate ruling, his argument that the procedure should he changed .was not appealing in that case.
I concur in the majority opinion.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bunch v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966