Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Labastida v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1996No. 25685Published

1ConcurrenceShearing, J.

I agree that the legislature has defined murder in such a way that Labastida’s failure to act could be found to be murder in the second degree and therefore her conviction must be affirmed.

However, I do not agree that there was substantial evidence that Labastida aided and abetted Strawser in committing murder. In fact, I do not see any evidence in the record which would support that conviction. Every bit of evidence in the record supports the conclusion that Michael Strawser inflicted a number of injuries on Thunder Michael Lightfoot Strawser, which eventually resulted in the child’s death.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Skinner v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Rodriguez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API