Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. C LAZY U RANCH

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 16, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-K-1196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

This diversity action is based on personal injuries sustained by plaintiff when she fell from a horse owned and allegedly saddled in a negligent manner by defendants, who own and operate the C Lazy U Ranch.

Defendants have moved for partial summary judgment as to plaintiffs’ claims based upon res ipsa loquitur, strict liability for a dangerous animal, strict products liability and strict liability for failure to warn and/or instruct as to a dangerous product. Plaintiffs have responded with a brief opposing defendants’ motion for partial summary…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Norton v. LiddelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  4. Newmark v. Gimbel's IncorporatedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  5. Union Supply Co. v. PustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Home Light and Power Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Latham v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Watts v. Rubber Tree, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Archuleta v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2025
  5. Pankey v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API