Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1936No. 25984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this action in mandamus originating in this court, the relator seeks relief from a claim for premiums assessed by the Industrial Commission against it as an employer and contributor to the Workmen's Compensation Fund upon the ground that in determining and fixing the rate of premium to be charged against it, the action of the Industrial Commission was in violation of the statutes whence the commission derives its authority and amounts to a taking of relator's property without due process of law, for which it has no adequate remedy except by action in mandamus. Issue is made by demurrer to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coviello v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Mutual Trucking Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  2. Marshall v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  4. 7 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1075, 1979 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 23,334 Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor v. Whirlpool Corporation and Empire-Detroit Steel Division, Detroit Steel Corporation, Whirlpool Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. Midvale Coal Co. v. Cardox Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API