Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Sanko Holding USA, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 17, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated May 20,1997, which, inter alia, granted the defendant’s motion to compel the plaintiff to accept, among other things, its answer, and denied the plaintiff’s cross motion, inter alia, for leave to enter a judgment upon the defendant’s default in answering.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the cross motion is granted..

As a general rule, a default will be vacated and a late answer will be permitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McFadden v. BattagliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Levy v. CusumanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harkless v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Widelec v. SilbersteinCivil Court of the City of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API