Legal Opinion

White v. Proebstel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Eakin. This is a suit by Amanda F. White, Elizabeth M. Caldwell, Lettie Lyons, Mary I. Norton and Clara E. Morey, against Frederick Proebstel and Media Proebstel, Ms wife, Marie B. Snodgrass, Joseph, M. Snodgrass and Bell Snodgrass, his wife, "William F. Snodgrass and Grace Snodgrass, his wife, Margaret Abbott and Frank T. Abbott, her hnsband, Jessie M. Bartlett and E. W. Bartlett, her husband, Sarah E. Van…

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Eakin. This is a suit by Amanda F. White, Elizabeth M. Caldwell, Lettie Lyons, Mary I. Norton and Clara E. Morey, against Frederick Proebstel and Media Proebstel, Ms wife, Marie B. Snodgrass, Joseph, M. Snodgrass and Bell Snodgrass, his wife, "William F. Snodgrass and Grace Snodgrass, his wife, Margaret Abbott and Frank T. Abbott, her hnsband, Jessie M. Bartlett and E. W. Bartlett, her husband, Sarah E. Van Burén and J. Yan Burén, her hnsband, James G. Snodgrass and Lola M. Snodgrass, his wife, Maud M. Snodgrass, John Francis…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin

Counsel claims to have offered the decree in the case of Goodsell v. Proebstel in evidence only to show an admission on the part of Frederick Proebstel in allowing the decree to go against him reforming the deed; and, plaintiff claiming no more, it is not necessary to consider whether the reformation of the- deed operated to actually reform the deed, or was only a quieting of the title of the plaintiffs in that suit.

1, 2. Defendants contend that the deeds from Gris-wold to the plaintiffs are void, because the plat to which they refer is too indefinite to identify the property or to connect…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bogard v. BarhanOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Oregon City v. Oregon & Cal. RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Kuck v. WakefieldOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Jaeger v. HarrOregon Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McMaster v. RubyOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Mays v. MorrellOregon Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API