Hoffschlaeger Co. v. Fraga
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Under the facts of this case the Supreme Court of the territory did not find it necessary to determine whether the practice of withdrawing a juror obtains in that territory, nor do we. It will be conceded that in some jurisdictions the admission of testimony, or an offer of proof, tending to show that an insurance company, not a party to the action, is the real party in interest, is reversible error, and it is generally conceded that offers of compromise are incompetent: But there is a vast difference between testimony or offers of proof in open court and…
2Cited by22 opinions
- Shelby v. Williams and Horney Livestock, Incorporated v. Joseph E. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Franco v. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
- Kometani v. HeathHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Evening Star Newspaper Company v. GrayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Condron v. HarlHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.