Legal Opinion

State v. Pierre

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 28, 2003No. 2002-K-2665PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

842 So.2d 321 (2003)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Deidre Antoinette PIERRE.

No. 2002-K-2665.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 28, 2003.

2Per curiam

Writ Granted; Conviction and Sentence Reinstated; Case Remanded. Although it remains the preferred method for the district court to advise a defendant of her right to trial by jury in open court before obtaining a waiver, such a practice is not statutorily required. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 780; State v. Kahey, 436 So.2d 475, 486 (La.1983); State v. Muller, 351 So.2d 143, 146-47 (La.1977). Likewise, it is preferred but not necessary, for the defendant to waive her right to…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KaheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. State v. MullerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  3. State v. WolfeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Cc Towing & Rec. Inc. v. State Dept. of Public Safety & Corr.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

4Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. GoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. BellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. State v. ZeringueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. State v. McCloudLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. State v. WoodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API