Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 27, 1917No. 4550PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for knowingly attempting to pass as true a forged note.

The prosecution was under article 937, P. C., which is: “If any person shall knowingly pass as true, or attempt to pass as true, any such forged instrument in writing as is mentioned and defined in the preceding articles of this chapter, he shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary not less than two nor more than five years.” The indictment was in three counts. The conviction was under the second, which is as follows: That appellant on December 6, 1916, in Dallas County,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RandleTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State v. EdmondsonTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  3. O'Marrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Hickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Melley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Byrom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Cedargreen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Berry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API