Legal Opinion

Lum v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 5, 1984No. CR 84-20PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Appellant Daniel Lum, was charged with the offense of battery in the first degree of Annette Mautz under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 41-1601 (1) (c). He was tried before a jury, found guilty of battery in the second degree and sentenced to six years. Appellant raises three points for reversal, none of which have merit.

There is no dispute as to the facts of the case, and the appellant himself testified, describing the battery and the surrounding circumstances. Appellant had been living with Debbie Hamm for about one year and Annette Mautz, Debbie’s younger sister, had persuaded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  3. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Burks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. State v. WestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Tarentino v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Dickson v. Delhi Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Enoch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API