Legal Opinion

Erdmann v. Erdmann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1975No. 370PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEobert W. Hansen, J.

Appellant was given two hats to wear by the divorce judgment. One was the hat of a noncustodial father directed by court order to make certain payments for the support and education of his minor children of the dissolved marriage. The other was the hat of custodian of an investment fund established by the divorce judgment for the support, maintenance, education and benefit of the same minor children. His claim is that he was entitled to doff the hat of a father, under court order to make support payments, long enough to don the hat of custodian of the investment fund so as to use the fund to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore Son v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Firestone v. FirestoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Stuit v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  4. Krause v. KrauseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Schwartz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. In Re Marriage of WolfertColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API