Winslow Engineering Company, Appellant-Petitioner v. Leroy Smith, an Individual, Doing Business as Rol Pak Co., Appellee-Respondent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
After our former decision in this case, 223 F.2d 438, we granted a rehearing limited to the question whether the appellant’s claims are invalid under the rule of Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co., 336 U.S. 271, 277, 69 S. Ct. 535, 538, 93 L.Ed. 672. Reference to our former opinion will disclose the reasons why we previously answered that question in the affirmative.
During the rehearing, the appellant, in analyzing the portion of the opinion in the Graver case which set forth the principles applicable to the requirement that statements of claims must “ ‘particularly point out…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Linde Air Products Co. v. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1947
- Winslow Engineering Company v. Leroy R. Smith, an Individual, Doing Business as Rol-Pak Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stranathan v. StowellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1981
- R. A. Henderson v. A.C. Spark Plug Division of General Motors Corporation, R. A. Henderson v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Madison Fund, Inc. (Formerly the Pennroad Corporation) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Madison Fund, Inc. (Formerly the Pennroad Corporation) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966