Legal Opinion

State Savings Bank v. Baker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1932No. Docket No. 220, Calendar No. 36,304PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff, State Savings Bank of Carleton, Michigan, filed a bill of interpleader to ascertain whether to pay a savings account of $1,945.73 to Minnie Todd, or Ruth Baker, or the estate of Mary Ehle, deceased, defendants herein. Mrs. Ehle, an elderly lady, moved into the home of Mrs. Todd on August 2, Í929. She had but a short time previously lived with relatives of Ruth Baker. In September, 1929, she opened a savings account in her own name in plaintiff bank, but within a day or two thereafter directed the cashier to add the name of Minnie Todd to the account, and thus make it a joint…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Trust & Savings Bank v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People's State Bank v. Miller's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kempski v. HisgenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  2. Equitable & Central Trust Co. v. ZdziebkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Ruch v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Neil v. National Bank of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API