Legal Opinion
Anthony C. Lustig v. AzGen Scientific Holdings PLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 21, 2020No. 4:18-cv-07503-HSGUnknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANTHONY C. LUSTIG, Case No. 18-cv-07503-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR 9 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT 10 AZGEN SCIENTIFIC HOLDINGS PLC, Re: Dkt. No. 47, 48 11 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Anthony Lustig (“Lustig”) filed a motion (“Motion”) for entry of default 14 judgment against Defendant AzGen Scientific Holdings PLC (“AzGen”), Dkt. No. 47. Paul Gray 15 and Luis Siemens, directors of AzGen, filed a purported opposition “pro se.”1 (“Opp.,” Dkt. No. 16 53). The Court held a hearing on the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Phillips v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.