Gay v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Kay County. STATEMENT OE EACTS. The plaintiffs in error are non-residents of the Territory of Oklahoma and owners of large herds of cattle that were kept and grazed, during a portion of the year 1895, in parts of the Osage Indian reservation in this territory. The defendants in error are the board of county commissioners, treasurer and sheriff of Kay county, Oklahoma Territory.
Read the full summary
Error from the District Court of Kay County. STATEMENT OE EACTS. The plaintiffs in error are non-residents of the Territory of Oklahoma and owners of large herds of cattle that were kept and grazed, during a portion of the year 1895, in parts of the Osage Indian reservation in this territory. The defendants in error are the board of county commissioners, treasurer and sheriff of Kay county, Oklahoma Territory. On the third Monday in February, 1894, the supreme court of the Territory of Oklahoma, by an order entered on the journals of said court, attached to said county of Kay, for judicial…
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF FACTS.
The plaintiffs in error are non-residents of the Territory of Oklahoma and owners of large herds of cattle that were kept and grazed, during a portion of the year 1895, in parts of the Osage Indian reservation in this territory.
The defendants in error are the board of county commissioners, treasurer and sheriff of Kay county, Oklahoma Territory.
On the third Monday in February, 1894, the supreme court of the Territory of Oklahoma, by an order entered on the journals of said court, attached to said county of Kay, for judicial purposes, all the Kaw or Kansas Indian reservation…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Southern Railway Co. v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Murray County v. Homesales, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Grable v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Texaco Exploration & Production, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.