Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miree v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 30, 1976No. Nos. 74-3670, 74-3822, 74-3864, 74-3870, 74-3881Published

1DissentDyer, Circuit Judge

Although I agree with the majority’s conclusion that DeKalb County is immune from suit for negligence and nuisance, I disagree with their conclusion that the county can be held liable by plaintiffs as third-party beneficiaries of the Federal Grant Agreement between the United States and the county. At most, plaintiffs are incidental beneficiaries of that agreement, not entitled to recover for breach of contract.

At the outset, the majority errs by looking to Georgia law in determining whether plaintiffs are third-party beneficiaries.1 Although jurisdiction here is based upon diversity, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  4. Leopold W. Mahler and Helen E. Mahler, His Wife, and Bertha Ebertsheim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Western Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API