Legal Opinion

American Centennial Insurance Company v. Flowery Branch Nursing Center

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 27, 1988No. 45329PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Chief Justice.

We granted certiorari to consider the issues of whether (1) the filing of new insurance coverage by a subsequent workers’ compensation insurer superseded the coverage of the initial insurer, who never filed a report of cancellation of coverage, and (2) the filing or nonfiling of such forms is conclusive, or merely rebuttable, evidence of coverage.

Appellant “American,” initially the workers’ compensation insurer of the appellee, “Flowery Branch,” filed a “Report of Coverage,” Form A (Rule 126 (a), Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation, Vol.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Samuel v. BaitcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. International Indemnity Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. WallsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Travelers Insurance Company v. SanfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trucks, Inc. v. TrowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Morgan v. Palace Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Trammell Crowe Construction Co. v. RumphCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Center v. American Centennial InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Chattanooga Truck Parts of North Georgia, Inc. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API