Legal Opinion
Fair Cadillac Oldsmobile Corp. v. Allard
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 11, 1996No. 14061PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This appeal arises out of a judgment of $165,708.43 rendered in favor of Bernard Meehan and against Fair Cadillac Oldsmobile Corporation (Fair Cadillac) by the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. After the expiration of the ten day automatic stay mandated by rule 69 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Meehan, through his attorney William Laviano, filed an application for an execution to be served on any bank at which Fair Cadillac maintained an account. On July 26, 1989, the clerk of the United States District Court signed the execution and issued it to Laviano.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allyn v. MatherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1832
- Aetna Insurance v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Neth v. CrofutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
- Smith v. YaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- R.C. Equity Group, LLC v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Corsair Special Situations Fund, L.P. v. Engineered Framing Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- O'brien-Kelley, Ltd. v. Town of GoshenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Park Distributors v. Ust Bank Conn., No. Cv96 033 45 76 (Jan. 28, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- R.C. Equity Group, LLC v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.