Legal Opinion
Wolf v. Novello
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 23, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*747Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court correctly upheld the moratorium (see Matter of Urban Strategies v Novello, 297 AD2d 745 [decided herewith]; Sheffield Towers Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr. v Novello, 293 AD2d 182; Matter of Jay Alexander Manor v Novello, 285 AD2d 951), and accordingly properly refused to direct the processing of the petitioner’s application. In any event, the remedy of mandamus to compel that act is unavailable, as there is no statute or regulation requiring the respondents to process or approve pending applications within a specific time period…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Jay Alexander Manor, Inc. v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Urban Strategies, Inc. v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Sheffield Towers Rehabilitation & Health Care Center v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allen v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesNew York Supreme Court · 2014
- Williamsville Clare Bridge Operator, Inc. v. NoveleoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004