Legal Opinion

Huntsman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1940No. 21046Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in this cause in which he insists that this court review the authorities cited on page two of his brief. The original opinion properly disposes of these authorities by saying that they are not pertinent. We have re-examined them and adhere to the original conclusion.

Further complaint on motion for rehearing is found in the contention that this court in its original opinion did not have evidence to justify its conclusion that the jury was warranted in finding that appellant intended to take his life when he cut…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Hanners v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Scroggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Studdard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Govan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API