Legal Opinion

Muffat v. Detroit-Macomb Land Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1931No. Docket No. 117, Calendar No. 35,197PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.

Merritt M. Willmarth was secretary and a large stockholder in the Detroit-Macomb Land Company, defendant corporation. He borrowed the sum of $1,100 and later the sum of $600 from Eleanor Woodworth and gave her as payee his notes in each instance. Willmarth secured the $600 note by indorsing over to the payee certificate No. 363 for 103 shares of stock in defendant corporation. The note contained provisions securing the payee not only for the face amount of the note with interest but also for all present and future indebtedness and liabilities, absolute and contingent, that might be due her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moores v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of PiquaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Farrington v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Havens v. Bank of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Green v. Caribou Oil Min. Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. National Bank v. Newellmorse Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Turners Building & Loan Ass'n v. SchreitmuellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. National Turners Building & Loan Ass'n v. SchreitmuellerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API