Legal Opinion
Pinkus v. Reilly
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 26, 1957No. Civ. A. 856-56PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
The issue in these proceedings involves the scope and effect of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq., which has been the subject of such lengthy interest and debate on both Executive and Congressional levels, as outlined in the case of Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 1949, 339 U.S. 33, 70 S.Ct. 445, 94 L.Ed. 616. The importance of this problem to the public is emphasized by the fact that it is cited in the Report of the Committee on Administrative Tribunals and Enquiries Presented by the Lord High Chancellor to Parliament by Command of Her Majesty,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Reilly v. PinkusSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cates v. HaderleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carmen Gonzalez v. Orville L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- T.S.C. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
- Vibra Brush Corp. v. Robert H. Schaffer, Postmaster of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Columbia Research Corporation and Allerton Pharmacal Corporation v. Robert H. Schaffer, Postmaster of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- United States v. 42 JARS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.