Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Coronado Oil Co. v. Grieves

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1979No. 5104Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

ROONEY, Justice,

partially concurring and partially dissenting.

I concur only with the majority order remanding this case to the district court. I dissent from the action taken by the majority of the court in addressing the issue of whether or not appellant had authority to take appellees’ private property on the record before us. The issue was not properly placed before us, and it is too important to be considered in an uninformed fashion. The case should have been returned to make necessary findings of fact, to establish proper jurisdiction and to enter a proper order. We have returned other…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. James Allen Budde v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., D/B/A Kentron Hawaii, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Tony Mark v. Paul GroffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Baycol, Inc. v. Downtown Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. Kessler v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. County of Orange v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API