Legal Opinion

Coronado v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 5, 2004No. 14-03-01055-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.

Appellant, Edward Galvan Coronado, was charged with failure to register pursuant to the Texas Sex Offender Registration Program (“SORP”). Appellant initially registered in 1998 when he was paroled following a conviction for aggravated sexual assault. Although he annually verified his registration, as required, for approximately six years, he failed to verify his registration in 2003. After he waived a jury trial, the trial court found him guilty and assessed punishment at twenty-five years’ confinement. On appeal, appellant

contends the SORP is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. William David Kelley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  2. KFOURI v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  3. Erazo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  4. Alex Erazo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  5. Andrew Fares Kfouri v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API