Hardt v. Schwab
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Engelbert Hardt and others against Emanuel Schwab, Terese Schwab, and others to' set aside a general assignment made by defendant Emanuel Schwab to defendant Herman Frohman, and certain judgments confessed by Emanuel Schwab in favor of Terese Schwab, Joseph Lilianthal, and others, as fraudulent and void as against plaintiffs, creditors of Emanuel Schwab.
Read the full summary
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Engelbert Hardt and others against Emanuel Schwab, Terese Schwab, and others to' set aside a general assignment made by defendant Emanuel Schwab to defendant Herman Frohman, and certain judgments confessed by Emanuel Schwab in favor of Terese Schwab, Joseph Lilianthal, and others, as fraudulent and void as against plaintiffs, creditors of Emanuel Schwab. From an interlocutory judgment holding the general assignment and judgments void, and from a final judgment determining the amount of their liabilities, defendants Terese Schwab and Joseph…
1Opinion of the CourtFollett, J.
For some years prior to November 25, 1887, Emanuel Schwab and Jacob Schwab were partners in the city of New York under the firm name of Schwab & Son. Before the date last mentioned, Jacob Schwab died, leaving Emanuel Schwab the surviving partner of that firm. On the 25th day of November, 1887, Emanuel Schwab confessed four judgments,—one in favor of Levi J. Gazan, for $2,021.47, which was entered and docketed at 11 o’clock A. M.; one in favor of Joseph Lilianthal, for $5,053.97, which was entered and docketed at 11 o’clock and 1 minute A. M.; one in favor of Terese Schwab, for $4,857.97,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Abegg v. SchwabNew York Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by1 opinion
- Levy v. HamiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902