Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1984No. 04-82-00235-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIAL, Justice.

This is an appeal by the sureties from a final judgment in the forfeiture of a bail bond. We affirm.

Appellant presents four points of error. Point one states the trial court erred in ordering a bond forfeiture because the bond failed to identify the court before whom the principal was first to appear. The bond reads in part:

The condition of the above obligation is such that whereas the above named principal, Sam L. Rodríguez, stands charged by information, duly presented in the County Court at Law No._of Bexar County, Texas, with a misdemeanor, to-wit, the offense of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Balboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Shropshire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Lyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bonds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Kubosh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  3. Marroquin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Felix Michael Kubosh v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API