Legal Opinion

Davis v. Pierse

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1862PublishedCited by 13 opinions

AEPEAL EEOM THE DISTEICT COUET OE EAMSEY COUNTY. This cause being at issue in tbe District Court of Ramsey County upon complaint, answer and reply, tbe Defendants Wilcox & Barber served a supplemental answer, whereof tbe following is a copy : The supplemental answer of Carlos Wilcox and Daniel R. Barber, Defendants in the above entitled action, respectfully shows to the Court, — ■ That said Defendants, upon information and belief, aver that E. A. W. Davis, the Plaintiff in…

Read the full summary

AEPEAL EEOM THE DISTEICT COUET OE EAMSEY COUNTY. This cause being at issue in tbe District Court of Ramsey County upon complaint, answer and reply, tbe Defendants Wilcox & Barber served a supplemental answer, whereof tbe following is a copy : The supplemental answer of Carlos Wilcox and Daniel R. Barber, Defendants in the above entitled action, respectfully shows to the Court, — ■ That said Defendants, upon information and belief, aver that E. A. W. Davis, the Plaintiff in the above entitled action, was, on and prior to the 4th day of February, a. d. 1862, and still is, a resident and citizen…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

Emmett, O. J.

As this case is presented to ns, the only question necessary to be considered, is as to the constitutionality of an act of our Legislature, passed February 14th, 1862, and entitled “An Act suspending the privilege of all persons aiding the rebellion against the United States, of prosecuting and defending actions and judicial proceedings in this State.” We have had the benefit, in this and other'eases since heard, of three distinct and elaborate discussions of this question, each time by different and learned counsel, — have taken ample time to consider the various…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Schweich v. Ziegler, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Alexander v. National Farmers' OrganizationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API