Legal Opinion · Dissent

DeBruin v. St. Patrick Congregation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2012No. 2010AP2705Published

1DissentAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 98. {dissenting). There is no majority opinion of this court. Of the five justices who would affirm the circuit court, three (Justice Roggensack, Justice Ziegler, and Justice Gableman) would decide this case on the constitution1 and two (Justice Crooks and Justice Prosser) would decide it on the specific contract at issue in this case. Accordingly, because no opinion has garnered the vote of four justices, nothing set forth in any of the opinions has precedential value.

¶ 99. When I examine the issue certified by the court of appeals, I conclude that DeBruin's common law contract claims do…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Walsh v. SchlechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API