Rogers v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
566 A.2d 69 (1989)
Michael W. ROGERS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 85-1421.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued En Banc September 14, 1988.
Decided November 17, 1989.[]
Peter N. Mann, Washington, D.C., appointed by the court, for appellant.
Helen M. Bollwerk, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., and Michael W. Farrell, Asst. U.S. Atty. at the time the brief was filed, and Thomas E. Zeno and Elizabeth Trosman, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.
James Klein, David Reiser, and Lisa Greenman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Rogers; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Newman.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Winters v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- United States v. James A. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- United States v. William Curtis, IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.