Legal Opinion
Atwood-Morrison Co. v. Sipp Electric & Machine Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided May 1, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions
In Equity. Letters patent No. 729,084 sustained on the evidence.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
The complainant corporation is owner of letters patent No. 729,084, which it alleges in its bill of complaint has been infringed by the defendant, and it asks for the usual relief in such cases. The complainant’s title to said patent is unassailed, and its infringement is admitted. Indeed, the proofs show that the defendant copied its device after the complainant’s and that they are practically alike. The patent in'suit is for certain “new and useful improvements in swift-brackets,” and its inventor described its purposes as follows:
“The object of my invention is to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Lehnbeuter v. HolthausSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Thayer v. HartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
- Wickelman v. A. B. Dick Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Mack v. Spencer Optical Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re RubelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1908
- De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. United States Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Standard Envelope Sealer Mfg. Co. v. Graywood Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1922