Legal Opinion

Brown v. Wysong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 1896Published

Appeal from a judgment, sustaining a demurrer to to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action,

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

—The complaint alleges that the defendant is the owner and occupant of tile premises known as “ No. SO East Thirty-Fourth Street,” in the city of New York, and as such owner and occupant, had and has the care and control of the areas, a rea ways, and other appurtenances therewith connected and belonging; that on the 30th day of January, 1895, a sheet of ice partially covered the portion of the sidewalk in said East Thirty-Fourth Street, a public street or highway in front of said premises- and ran or extended from a gate or door leading from an area or areaway of said premises into and upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. City of Rochester v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. McGoldrick v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API