Legal Opinion
McIntosh v. Cueto
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 28, 2001No. 5-99-0717PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins
Michelle McIntosh and Elaine Dinges (formerly Elaine McIntosh) (collectively, plaintiffs) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Amiel Cueto and his law firm, Cueto, Daley, Williams, Moore & Cueto, Ltd. (collectively, defendants). Plaintiffs claim that defendants are guilty of legal malpractice for having allowed the statute of limitations on plaintiffs’ medical malpractice claim to run without filing a complaint. Plaintiffs argue that even though they filed their legal malpractice case beyond the legal malpractice statute of limitations (735 ILCS 5/13—212 (West…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parks v. KownackiIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
- Pagano v. Occidental Chemical Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Dancor International, Ltd. v. Friedman, Goldberg & MintzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Vail v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Hirsch v. FeuerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hester v. DiazAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Gold Realty Group Corp. v. Kismet Café, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Kohn v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- KOCZOR v. MelnykAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Rocha v. FedEx Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.